Search for: "Samsung LED Company, Limited"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 3:38 pm
With respect to potential remedy, Samsung requests that the Commission issue a permanent limited exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order directed at OSRAM and related companies. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 7:21 pm
And occasionally, even Samsung gets sued in the Western District, such as by a non-practicing entity named LED Wafer Solutions on Thursday (click on the image to enlarge):All one can google about that company is this lawsuit. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 10:28 am
The same problem exists for LCD and LED TVs apparently, but to a much lesser extent. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
Even, we heard, Samsung has opened a research center here so that they can take advantage of the talent in this area.The companies provide jobs. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
Now it requires every customer to work for this company two days per month. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:26 am
The important N/nexus here is not the Nexus phone, which has limited market relevance at this stage, but the causal nexus requirement for injunctive relief. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 12:55 pm
The company was formed based on research conducted at the University of Michigan led by Dr. [read post]
7 May 2013, 11:41 pm
On Monday, a Google-led group of companies also including HTC, SAP, Rackspace and Red Hat filed a motion for leave to submit an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in connection with Apple's appeal of a district court's denial of a permanent injunction despite a multiplicity of infringement findings by a federal jury. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:28 am
The underlying actions were filed by a patent holding company known as Ikorongo Texas LLC against Samsung and LG Electronics. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:49 am
The regional court enjoined Samsung's German subsidiary, but refused to enjoin its Korean parent company. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 10:28 pm
If they're interested only in their margins as a device maker, that's a legitimate parameter--but companies like Xiaomi (a company with a product lineup most similar to Samsung Electronics) and Vestel (much smaller, but also a Samsung competitor in the TV market) are still entitled to a license to Samsung's patents on FRAND terms.Samsung has an interesting history with respect to FRAND. [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:00 pm
Samsung litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:47 am
OHIM preferred Samsung’s argument that, as a highly successful company operating in the IT sector itself, Apple could be expected to be ‘tech savvy’ and resourceful enough to monitor the content of blogs and websites discussing the designs of tablet computers. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:11 am
" And that's just a small and limited part of the overall litigation activity by Fortress-controlled companies against Apple. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:10 am
An MPEG LA press release states that "[a] team led by Axel Verhauwen of Krieger Mes & Graf v. der Groeben and Gottfried Schüll of Cohausz & Florack represented the plaintiffs. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:44 am
-led sanctions, including on advanced tech components. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
That led to the development of the first stone mirrors, followed by metal, and then glass -- the latter still being a common display surface for many electronic devices. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:33 am
Google has previously announced various patent cross-license agreements, with partners including (but not limited to) Samsung and Cisco. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 11:28 am
The dismissal of all lawsuits between these companies also simplifies things with a view to the formal closing of Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia's wireless devices business. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 12:32 pm
It’s the main way that U.S. companies hire skilled foreign workers. [read post]
